Microsoft won’t take no for an answer!

It looks like Microsoft might be refusing to take no for an answer in their bid to buy out Yahoo! in a bid worth $40Bn.  After having their bid rejecting because the Yahoo! board believed it significantly undervalued their brand and investment in technology Microsoft are rumoured to be responding by attempting to ignite a proxy fight to take over the company.  Such a proxy fight would see Microsoft nominate a group of directors sympathetic to a deal for shareholders to vote on at Yahoo’s annual meeting.   According to Morningstar this is Microsoft using the carrot and the stick approach, just both at the same time! The carrot of the share price, 62% above trading price, and the stick which comes in the form of the threat of a proxy battle.  The drama continues and maybe Microsoft will get their way after all!

Microsoft buying Yahoo - what does it mean?

Ive finally gotten round to having a little think about the big news story of the week, Microsoft tabling a bid of $44.6 Billion in cash and stock to buy its rival Yahoo.  There has been no official comment from Yahoo on the reports but I thought Id document my thoughts on the impace this could have.

The portal market

Yahoo and MSN are the two big players in the portal market, the one stop shop for all you web needs, search engine, web mail, news feed, weather reports, all in one place.  This is where Microsoft will gain a massive advantage and pretty much gain complete dominance.  Aside from the ISP sites, which gain their visitors through having a default homepage setting in the ISP setup process, Microsoft will have a dominance in this field comparable to Google’s in the search market (more of that in a minute!).  So what does this mean to MSN? Well instantly they will take on board the lions share of the portal advertising revenues around the world.  Yahoo has built an advertising model which is highly lucrative and brings in a huge amount of revenue each year, utilising the latest behavioural targeting technology to keep online advertising moving forward.  MSN obviously has its own advertising model and ideas on how the market is going to advance but they will automatically boost their ad revenues with the purchase.  It also sets them up well for the predicted rise in online ad spend over the next few years, from $40 billion to $80 billion if you believe the predictions, dominance in a market this size is a mouth watering prospect.

The search market

This is where it gets really interesting.  Microsft has struggled to gain a foothold in the search market since it launched its own PPC model in 2006 and I forecasted in a previous post (Microsoft sets its sights on 40% market share) that a purchase may be on the cards if they were to achieve their targets.  The purchase of Yahoo Search Marketing (YSM), if part of the deal, would possibly take their market share into the double figures in the paid search arena.  Their system is good at present, the quality of their traffic is good, its just the volume they have been missing.  YSM would help boost this and make them a legitimate number 2 in this arena and they undoubtedly have the fire power to make dents in Google’s dominance (see their response here).  It does raise the question, what does this mean to search agencies?  the market which was due to fragment with the launch of wikia search, AOL breaking out in the US, Ask hinting at the same, is now significantly consolidated if this deal does actually go through.  Does this make SEM simpler? Not really but it could be perceived that way, a post for another time I think.

How do they manage it?

This will be interesting, does Yahoo become Microsoft branded?  or is it just another property of the technology giant?  Does it become Microhoo? Yasoft? Mahoo? or does it become Yahoo - a Microsoft company? and more importantly for internet marketers do they keep the two infrastructures separate, the advertising interfaces, the search algorithms, the display advertising models.  This is what will be the key determinant of what this means to the industry and what it means to digital agencies.

Whether the deal goes through remains to be seen, when it goes through is another question yet to be answered. What is undeniable is that it is going to influence the online advertising market significantly, in what way, remains to be seen.

Wikia Search First Impressions

I had my first look at the Wikia Search alpha today and I have to say the results are absolute pants!  To be fair to them the people at Wikia do say the results won’t be great at the moment as the basis of their engine is that of user reviews and not so much algorithmic search, hence results will improve rapidly over time as listings begin to get scored by users.  I have to admit that I like the idea of a user ranked search engine, after all, how many websites do you come across which have absolutely no relevance to your search phrase? (my blog ranks rather highly for “search pornsex” for example!) But not only that, a user can make more judgements on things like usability and site layout than a search engine spider which should further help the best websites rise to the top.  The process appears relatively simple, hover over a result and a five star scale will appear allowing you to score the result, this will then be used along with the algorithmic properties to determine a websites position.  This will be wholly reliant obviously on users picking up on and participating in this ranking process so I will be watching with a lot of interest how the results improve over the coming weeks.Aside from the standard results there is also going to be a section at the top of results reserved for “mini articles” on each subject.  According to Wikia “These will vary in purpose according to the circumstance, but the primary uses will be:

  • Short definitions
  • Disambiguations
  • Photos
  • See also “

Generated by the users these will obviously take the same form of the Wikipedia pages and will undoubtedly include some Wikipedia content for sections yet to be populated by the new system.  Wikia Search undoubtedly has the potential to become the most relevant search engine but the worry, as has been the problem with tagging sites such as digg in recent times, is that people begin to play the system, creating alias accounts to boost their own contents ratings and therefore rank, totally devaluing the whole platform.  If Wikia Search really does become the next number one contender to the big G then the temptation to find a “quick win” within its system will grow stronger in line with its visitor stats.  At present I believe Wikia plans to get around the duplicate account problem by basing its user on IP address but that doesn’t sound like to much of a robust system to me and I cant imaging it will be long before the spammers have an easy way of beating it.

I may have sounded negative in this post but I honestly hope Wikia Search succeeds, I hate the dominance Google has on the search market.  I also love the thought of users producing the search results rather than a piece of software.  On this initial offering I think there is a long way to go with the next big pretender.

Hot off the press! US clears Google-Doubleclick deal

Google are one step closer to the doubleclick buy out! as reported below on bbc news and here on Google’s own blog:

US clears Google-Doubleclick deal

 

US regulators have approved Google’s $3.1bn (£1.56bn) takeover of online advertising firm Doubleclick. The Federal Trade Commission ruled that the deal would not lead to a substantial fall-off in competition for internet adverts.

However, the EU Commission is still probing the deal and Google has said it would not complete the takeover until it was cleared by Brussels.

Google and Doubleclick have different roles in online advertising.

Doubleclick helps to link up advertising agencies, marketers and web site publishers hoping to put ads online and track them.

Google allows firms to target advertising at people using particular search terms and also stores information about users’ internet surfing habits.

Microsoft and AT&T have lobbied heavily against the deal going ahead.

Gambling Fools

I used to think gambling companies were pretty intelligent when it came to online advertising. I have dealt with a few of them and due to the size of the online market in their industry, and prioir to a few months ago, the restrictions which prohibited them from using many of the traditional forms of media, they are usually pretty clued up. Many have large in house teams to deal with their online activity as it is a key to their business and over the past few years more and more gamblers are turning to the internet to feed their addiction 24 hours a day and away from the environment of the traditional bookmakers.

A couple of searches today however have made me think otherwise. The biggest sporting event this weekend, and the most eagerly awaited boxing contest of the last 12 months, takes place this weekend in las vegas when Ricky “the hitman” hatton goes toe to toe with floyd mayweather for the title of best pound for pound fighter in the world. This event is a bookmakers dream, all the hype, all the build up and unlimited interest. But yet when I search on phrases related to the fight and specifically betting on it the big players are conspicuous by their absence searches on “hatton odds”, “mayweather odds” and “hatton mayweather odds” produce just 4 results in total. In the past when I have been involved in gambling campaigns attention to detail and the major sporting events have been key to their success but it appears that they are missing a trick at the moment. I know boxing isnt one of their major sports for account driving but surely this weekend would be a time to make hay?hatton vz mayweather
Have a Free £25 bet on totesport
Gambling Fools
extrabet
Gambling Fools
Play Rummy For Money
Play Free Online Gin Rummy and Kalooki with Friends
Gambling Fools
Back or Lay at Betfair.com. Click Here!
Gambling Fools

Next Page »