<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rob Weatherhead &#187; youtube Archives  &#8211; The Digital Lookout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/tag/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Genius Solution to the YouTube Conundrum</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/googles-youtube-advertising-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/googles-youtube-advertising-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online display advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced its genius solution to conundrum of how to get a return on its $1.6bn purchase of YouTube in 2006.  They have decided that the current rate of £25,000 a day for homepage advertising on the video sharing site is too cheap! And so they are putting the daily advertising rate up by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has announced its genius solution to conundrum of how to get a return on its $1.6bn purchase of YouTube in 2006.  They have decided that the current rate of £25,000 a day for homepage advertising on the video sharing site is too cheap! And so they are putting the daily advertising rate up by 28% to £35,000. Genius!  OK, so they are making the homepage advertising options a little more interesting with expandable videos and potential full homepage takeovers but really, is this the best Google come up with?</p>
<p>Homepage takeovers and sponsorships are going to be the last thing on brand advertisers minds in times when return on advertising spend is more critical than ever.  Surely a more innovative and flexible advertising solution would have been a better option and attracted a broader range of advertisers rather than the few who are willing to fork out £35,000 for a days advertising.</p>
<p>The success of the latest Facebook and MySpace solutions is built on the fact they are flexible and accessible to all.  There are thousands of businesses out there who are dying to tap into the social media masses and they now can, through the latest Facebook and MySpace platforms.  This will keep the two networks going in a time when large budget advertisers are tightening the purse strings.  Who is going to be buying a £35,000 homepage takeover on YouTube when times are tight?</p>
<p>Unfortunately Google have dropped the ball with this one for me, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if they were heading back to the drawing board in 6 months time due to a lack of uptake on their latest proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/googles-youtube-advertising-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Use Commissions to Promote Growth in Non Search Products</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/google-commission-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/google-commission-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practice funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jan 1st 2009 the current Google Best Practice Funding programme will be no more.  The programme aimed at rewarding agencies who show growth of both clients and revenues by rewarding a % rebate on all spend with Google is being scrapped.  This move has been coming for a few years with Google gradually changing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Jan 1st 2009 the current Google Best Practice Funding programme will be no more.  The programme aimed at rewarding agencies who show growth of both clients and revenues by rewarding a % rebate on all spend with Google is being scrapped.  This move has been coming for a few years with Google gradually changing the programme and its conditions to slowly reduce the amount returned to agencies.  Originally set at the market rate of 15% for agency purchases Google has tweeked and changed their model to bring it down to a level where the bigger agencies are currently on receiving 6-8% commission on their sizeable Google budgets through the current Best Practice Funding Scheme.</p>
<p>This obviously as cause agencies to rethink their current commercial agreements with clients and could see some major shake-ups in the search marketing agency world as existing contracts become unmanageable without the commission in place.</p>
<p>What has become clear in the last couple of weeks however is what Google now plans to do with agency commission, they are going to use it to grow their non-search products.  It has been clear to see recently for those who deal with Google on a regular basis, that Google is desperate to expand their product mix outside of paid search.  They have launched <a title="google media planning software" href="http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/google-launches-media-planning-software/" target="_blank">media planning tools</a>, <a title="display ad creation tool" href="http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/display-advertising/google-launches-display-ad-creation-tool/" target="_blank">display ad creation</a> tools and have used every given opportunity to push the Google Placement Network.  Similarly with Youtube and their video advertising options, there has been national roadshows to agencies broadcasting the availability of their video advertising options.</p>
<p>And now this week Google has announced that they will be introducing agency commissions on all YouTube advertising (<a title="google comissions video advertising" href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Articles/40221/Google+to+introduce+agency+commission+on+video+ads.html" target="_blank">nma article here</a>) and it is thought that the rebate amount is going to be back up to the 15% agencies enjoy on other media channels.  There are also rumours in the industry that a commission is set to be introduced on advertising across the Google Placement Network, although only for the largest players.</p>
<p>So it appears Google no longer feels it needs to compete in pay per click advertising due to its dominance, and that it is better placed rewarding advertisers in the areas it wishes to grow in.  You cant really fault them on that logic.  The removal of Best Practice Funding is unlikely to see agencies pulling spend from their Google Adwords campaigns, as it remains the best performing search engine around.  But by offering an incentive to broaden the products utilised they can begin to make headway in other areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/google/google-commission-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Battle for US Presidency Enters the Digital Age!</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/in-game-advertising/the-battle-for-us-presidency-enters-the-digital-age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/in-game-advertising/the-battle-for-us-presidency-enters-the-digital-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In Game Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingame advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle to become arguably the most powerful man on earth has entered the digital age this time around as both candidates for the US presidency look to utilise digital channels to gain votes in the election race.  The BBC reports how both Barack Obama and John McCain have used the web as a medium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The battle to become arguably the most powerful man on earth has entered the digital age this time around as both candidates for the US presidency look to utilise digital channels to gain votes in the election race.  The <a title="us presidency goes online" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7671626.stm" target="_blank">BBC reports</a> how both Barack Obama and John McCain have used the web as a medium for the election campaigns.  Both candidates have used the power of YouTube to broadcast debates and speeches from their campaign creating their own channels with Obama going as far as integrating Google checkout for charitable donations! <a title="barak obama youtube channel" href="http://uk.youtube.com/user/barackobamadotcom?ob=4" target="_blank">Barackobamadotcom</a> <a title="john mccain youtube channel" href="http://uk.youtube.com/user/johnmccaindotcom?ob=4" target="_blank">johnmccaindotcom</a></p>
<p>Barack Obama has even gone as far as using in game advertising to try and reach the youth audience taking out ads in 18 video games including Guitar Hero, Burnout Paradise and Madden 09!  The ads were to promote his website, vote for change, and are an openly stated as an attempt to &#8220;reach young males 18-34&#8243;.  How successful these campaigns are remains to be seen, I suspect YouTube is a far more useful medium than Guitar Hero!  I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m concentrating on anything more than rocking out the next big riff and thrilling the crowd with some smoking solos! But maybe that&#8217;s just me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/in-game-advertising/the-battle-for-us-presidency-enters-the-digital-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wii Fit YouTube video &#8211; Real or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/online-video/was-it-a-plant-nintendo-wont-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/online-video/was-it-a-plant-nintendo-wont-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wii fit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wii fit girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/was-it-a-plant-nintendo-wont-care</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was it a plant? Wasn&#8217;t it a plant? The guy who posted the video on Youtube and Nintendo claim that there is no link between them and this is not an attempt at social/viral media which has gone wrong. In reality the arguement is unimportant as Nintendo will have benefited massively from the exposure Wii [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it a plant? Wasn&#8217;t it a plant?  The guy who posted the video on Youtube and Nintendo claim that there is no link between them and this is not an attempt at social/viral media which has gone wrong.  In reality the arguement is unimportant as Nintendo will have benefited massively from the exposure Wii fit has gained through this story so whether it originated from them or not doesn&#8217;t actually matter, it is still a huge success.  Im not sure whether the viewers on Youtube are marvelling at the technology behind Wii fit but they are showing an interest in something!</p>
<p>Some of the articles relating to this story:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2110445/Wii-Fit-underwear-girl-A-marketing-hoax.html" target="_blank">Wii Fit Underwear Girl a Marketing Hoax</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1025434/Girl-Wii-fit-YouTube-clip-gets-TWO-MILLION-admirers.html" target="_blank">Wii Fit YouTube clip gets two million admirers</a><br />
<a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/30832/Wii-Fit-turns-YouTube-sensation" target="_blank">Wii Fit turns YouTube sensation</a></p>
<p>And here is the link to the video, I would have embedded it but for some reason it is messing up the page layout!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v31qxrXsxv0" target="_blank">Wii Fit YouTube Video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/online-video/was-it-a-plant-nintendo-wont-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC iPlayer leads the way in on demand online</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/digital-marketing/bbc-iplayer-leads-the-way-in-on-demand-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/digital-marketing/bbc-iplayer-leads-the-way-in-on-demand-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/bbc-iplayer-leads-the-way-in-on-demand-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BBC&#8217;s iPlayer service is wiping the floor with its rivals in the on demand TV market recording up to 500,000 programme downloads a day. 11m TV shows were streamed or downloaded through iPlayer in January in comparison to 2.7m for channel 4&#8242;s system 4od and 2m for ITV. The massive amounts of advertising dollars spent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC&#8217;s iPlayer service is wiping the floor with its rivals in the on demand TV market recording up to 500,000 programme downloads a day.  11m TV shows were streamed or downloaded through iPlayer in January in comparison to 2.7m for channel 4&#8242;s system 4od and 2m for ITV.  The massive amounts of advertising dollars spent promoting the service have no doubt prompted its dominance but will also have given the on demand market as a whole a boost as people become more aware that you can watch your favourite shows from your laptop at any time of the day and night.</p>
<p>The opportunity and issue now facing BBC iPlayer is how to monetise this growing service without annoying its users.  Advertising in online video files has been debated far and wide and yet the most appropriate format is yet to be decided upon.  Pre-roll, post-roll and overlay are the main considerations with the option of mid roll placements as well but all interfere with the user experience in some way.  The key is to strike a balance between the exposure of the ad and the interference with the viewing.</p>
<p>Youtube are still to achieve this and at a recent seminar they were still asking the advertisers what their preference would be for the ads.  Youtube have gone with an overlay style ad for in video but admitted trialling preroll and post roll with both showing negative results.  I wonder whether the BBC will be able to crack the code?</p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border: medium none ; background: #0c0c0c none repeat scroll 0% 50%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; border-collapse: collapse" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1pt solid silver; padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 22.8pt;" width="30" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;"> </span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 89.15pt; border: 1pt 1pt 1pt medium solid solid solid none silver silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="119" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">Service</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 90.35pt; border: 1pt 1pt 1pt medium solid solid solid none silver silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="120" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">Unique streams Dec 2007</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 22.8pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt none solid solid -moz-use-text-color silver silver;" width="30" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">1</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 89.15pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="119" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">YouTube.com</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 90.35pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="120" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">20,207,947</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 22.8pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt none solid solid -moz-use-text-color silver silver;" width="30" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">2</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 89.15pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="119" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">BBC sites</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 90.35pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="120" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">5,129,442</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 22.8pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt none solid solid -moz-use-text-color silver silver;" width="30" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">3</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 89.15pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="119" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">ITV sites</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 90.35pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="120" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">1,727,567</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 22.8pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt none solid solid -moz-use-text-color silver silver;" width="30" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">4</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 89.15pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="119" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">Channel4.com</span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 90.35pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="120" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;">769,927</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 22.8pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt none solid solid -moz-use-text-color silver silver;" width="30" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: aqua;"> </span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 89.15pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="119" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="color: aqua;">Total Internet</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0cm 5.4pt; width: 90.35pt; border: medium 1pt 1pt medium none solid solid none -moz-use-text-color silver silver -moz-use-text-color;" width="120" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="color: aqua;">28,686,485</span></strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/digital-marketing/bbc-iplayer-leads-the-way-in-on-demand-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadbury plans the Gorilla follow up</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/social-media/cadbury-plans-the-gorilla-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/social-media/cadbury-plans-the-gorilla-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadburys gorilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of its record breaking 2008 marketing budget Cadbury are planning a follow up to their much loved drumming gorilla advert. According to the latest edition of Marketing the new ad will also feature an animal playing an instrument. The original advert was a major viral success achieving numerous blog postings, massive word of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of its record breaking 2008 marketing budget Cadbury are planning a follow up to their much loved drumming gorilla advert. According to the latest edition of Marketing the new ad will also feature an animal playing an instrument. The original advert was a major viral success achieving numerous blog postings, massive word of mouth and many a parody on Youtube (you can see some of them <a title="cadbury gorilla" href="http://youtube.com/results?search_query=cadbury+gorilla&amp;search=Search" target="_blank">here</a>). So the follow up has a hard task following in its footsteps, as do he agency charged with creating the ad. The original one worked well due to the human like actions of a gorilla but I cant see many other animals having the same impact without looking too comical. Answers on a postcard what you think the new animal and instrument will be and heres the original again just for fun!</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TnzFRV1LwIo&amp;rel=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TnzFRV1LwIo&amp;rel=1" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/social-media/cadbury-plans-the-gorilla-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This guys got the moves!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/social-media/this-guys-got-the-moves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/social-media/this-guys-got-the-moves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guy has the moves!! and 51,317,418 viewings! just goes to show the power of youtube and helps explain the £25,000 a day they are going to be charging advertisers for front page exposure when it launches in the UK. This may sound a lot on the face of it but I dont actually think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy has the moves!! and 51,317,418 viewings! just goes to show the power of youtube and helps explain the £25,000 a day they are going to be charging advertisers for front page exposure when it launches in the UK.</p>
<p>This may sound a lot on the face of it but I dont actually think its a bad deal. with youtube set to overtake the bbc website in the rankings for site visits the cost per thousand on front page exposure isnt going to be too shabby.</p>
<p>The challenge is going to be finding a video which people want to view, add to favourites and ultimately get to the top of the most viewed rankings. If this can be done then the £25,000 cost will stretch much further than one day as the viewings will continue as long as the video remains top of the standings. On top of this, if the video can be used to promote some sort of response from the user, through a youtube microsite or other means then you could be on to a winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robweatherhead.co.uk/social-media/this-guys-got-the-moves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

