Archives For author

How much to charge for a product or service is a tricky task as there are many ways in which you can approach it.  Some people look at the market and see what others are charging, some people go through a testing phase of pricing elasticity, other just seem to make it all up!

But there is one tactic which I strongly think should be avoided, yet people seem to do it, and that is pricing based on what you think people will be willing to pay.  This is generally done when you think there is an above average margin to be made, or your customers aren’t savvy enough to understand the cost of delivering the service.  But ultimately this approach leads to unsatisfied or disillusioned customers, and eventually you are going to have to reduce costs as competition increases or customer awareness brings more transparency.

I recently experienced this approach whilst on honeymoon in Bali.  We stayed in 2 different 5 star hotels on the island, both of them great in very different ways.  But what they both had in common was their ridiculous over charging for food and drinks.  I had a rough idea of the wages they were paying staff, and the general price of goods and services in the country and could not fathom how they were coming up with their prices.  It wasn’t even as if you had to go far for a comparison.  10 mins from each hotel was a local centre where you could buy meal and drinks, of a similar quality to which you could find in the hotel for around 40% of the price.  I am also pretty sure even these prices were a fair amount higher than other areas of Bali given the resorts and areas we were staying in.

The only reasoning I could come up with for the hotels pricing policies was the nature of the clientele.  The hotels were largely frequented by Europeans, Australians and Asians who are from more affluent markets than Bali.  It seemed clear to me therefore that  the hotel was simply pricing based on what they thought people would be willing to pay, and had the money to pay, rather than what they should charge based on their in costs and an acceptable margin level.

The outcome of this approach was damaging on two levels.  Firstly it left the restaurants and bars relatively empty most of the time as people quickly realised they got more for their money just down the road.  Secondly, it left customers such as myself feeling exploited when they did pay for food and drinks, and left a negative opinion of what were, in all other areas, excellent hotels.

I’m not saying you should cut your margins to unmanageable levels to please your customers.  Make sure your margins after in costs are enough to keep your business running and make sufficient profits, but don’t feel tempted to add additional margin where unnecessary.  Pricing in a more logical and fair way will lead to more customers (as your prices are less prohibitive) and will leave customers happier, leading to return business and recommendations.

In the case of the hotels above, if not for the pricing I would have been raving to anybody who listened about them.  But due to their pricing strategy there is always a bit “but” at the end of the description which makes the review less glowing.  I am also only likely to recommend the hotels to those with deep pockets or credit card limits thus reducing the word of mouth effect.

Your pricing has major impacts on your business and how well you can scale, whatever market you operate in.  So before you start to get greedy with your margins, think about how it might impact your ability to sell, and the message your customers will be putting into the market about you.

I came across an interesting graph the other day when playing around with Google trends.  When you plot the trends for PPC and SEO side by side since 2004 you can see a clear shift in interest.  The market (or so trends suggests) has shifted from being highly PPC biased to the complete opposite.

search marketing trends

I put this shift down to a commoditisation of PPC in many areas of the market, alongside Google’s aggressive sales strategy, as well as a demystifying of SEO into something which is now a core part of any online marketing strategy.

It will be interesting for me to see how this progresses over the next year or so as back when I started out in PPC it was very much the mysterious beast that SEO is now, or has been in recent years.  But as it has become less of a mystery, and companies have become to understand it more, many services have become devalued and with agencies having to make sure they are at the cutting edge of the market to make sure they are adding sufficient value to their clients.  As SEO too, becomes a more widely covered topic will it go the same way?  Will the fees clients are willing to pay be driven down and more clients look to take their SEO in house?

If so, what will replace it?  You can see on the bottom of the trend graph Facebook advertising starting to creep into the picture as a trending keyword, maybe some terminology around social advertising is going to be the next boom topic in digital advertising.  It’ll be interesting to see how it pans out.

times paywall

There have been many confusing messages in the media about the success or failure of the Times paywall.  Competitor publications have predictably claimed it to be a huge failure; other figures suggest a drop off of two thirds readership from free to paid is a success against the 90% drop off the Times had expected.  Claims that the Times is now “an empty world” seem inconclusive with the publication themselves have declined to comment.

For me, whatever level the user base has dropped to, this is just phase 1 of the paywall process, and it will be the next 6-12 months that dictate the true success of the paywall as it begins to take shape and there are a number of key factors which will determine its true success.

Quality of content

If you are going to charge people for access to news articles and opinion, it’s going to have to be better than other articles available for free elsewhere.  The Times will have to ensure their editorial content is going to have to be of a higher quality than their competition to justify the charge and prove that the money is going to good use.

Advertising revenues

Just because the paywall is in place doesn’t mean the Times has written off advertising as a revenue channel, far from it.  In fact having registered users in a closed network opens up a host of additional options for targeted advertising.  Historically advertising in newspapers and on their online versions has been done based on readership and audience profiles.  The information required to sign up for the paywall will enable the Times to offer targeting options based on an individual user, rather than an aggregated version of the whole group.  This type of targeting general allows for more premium pricing and if they manage to do it intelligently could generate serious income.

Word of mouth

At the moment the Times are the bad guys for charging for content.  A small group have decided to stick with it and if the Times can prove the value to this group, then this group will become key to future growth.  When people find out that somebody pays for the Times content, they are bound to ask “why?”, and “whats it like?”, if the response is positive you have a potential new buyer, if its neutral or negative, then you don’t.  If the response is “awesome, great content, a great read and well worth the money” then word will spread.

The competition

The Times are the first to introduce a paywall in traditional press, but I doubt they will be the last.  Other online publications are going to have to find their own way to make sure revenues generated online cover the overheads of delivering the content.  Whilst the competition can sit back and suggest the paywall is a failure for now, there is going to come a point where they have to decide what the route forward for their own online strategy is.  And if it materialises that other follow down the paywall route, then the Times will be ahead of the game in terms of making it work.

It’s all about building momentum

All of these points will contribute to building momentum (or not).  If you present great editorial to current users, they will spread the word and your user base will grow.  Continue to add even more great content and value, and you build a snowball effect.  Similar with the advertising, if you build a solid advertising model and targeting options you might convince a few media buyers to give it a go, if it’s good, word will spread.  Obviously this requires the Times to get a few things right.  If the content isn’t good, or the advertising model is poor, then momentum won’t build and things might go into meltdown.  There’s a long road ahead, but it definitely can’t be deemed a success or failure just yet.

So, it seems like I was wrong all those months ago when I suggested affiliate marketing might be set to benefit from the recession.  Today DGM announced to the world it was entering into administration proving that despite its “risk proof” benefits for merchants, it was still susceptible to the struggling economy.

Whilst on the same day Affiliate Window formally merged with Zanox, a deal which originated last year but seems set to become something more formal from a public facing perspective.  With Zanox already owning Buy.at they now represent a large portion of the UK affiliate marketing space.  It could be suggested however that the merging of 3 companies in the same space indicates that one, or all, of them was also not in the healthiest of shapes.

Its a shame for DGM who were always the most supportive network for smaller merchants and for me, the most helpful towards agencies.  No doubt somebody is going to start blaming the management of the company, which is natural, but we mustn’t forget the current situation is hitting everyone pretty hard.  In fact, I was surprised how few companies fell during 2009, although what we may be seeing is a delayed impact.  With I-level going under recently and now DGM, two well established companies in their chosen field, could we now be seeing the true impact of the recession as companies can no longer hold on?  Many others may be experiencing similar difficulties and desperately hoping for the market to pick up.

Infographics seem to be becoming a very popular method for displaying information on social media and search engine marketing, as well as a useful link building tool for their producers.  Below are a collection of useful infographics I have come across recently that help explain search engine marketing, SEO and PPC.

How Does Google Work?

Infographic by PPC Blog

scatterplot seo tactics

Scatter plot graphic by SEOmoz

Google PageRank Explained

Link juice infographic

Pagerank and Linkjuice Infographic by Elliance